Tag Archive for: patent strategy

Can a Single Online Post Destroy the Novelty of Your Patent?

,

In an era where ideas hit the internet before breakfast through preprints like GitHub commits, Discord forum dumps, LinkedIn “build in public” threads, and even leaked pitch decks, your idea might already be public domain before you file your first provisional. Patent examiners are finding these breadcrumbs with AI-powered search engines that never sleep.

Welcome to the new landscape of patentability: one where your first task isn’t claim drafting, but a digital excavation.

Why Do Founders Keep Falling into the Prior Art Trap?

Most first-time innovators think “prior art” means dusty old patents filed by big corporations. In reality, prior art is everything the internet has touched. That includes:

      a) academic preprints

      b) GitHub repositories

      c) product demo videos

      d) YouTube explainers

      e) Kickstarter campaigns

      f) conference abstracts 

      g) university archives

      h) whitepapers

      i) internal documentation leaks

Which means, legally, your “brand new” invention may already be publicly accessible, even if it’s buried three clicks deep in an unindexed PDF uploaded by a PhD student at 3 AM.

Thus, it results in founders unknowingly destroying their own novelty long before drafting claims. The invention was brilliant, but it had already been disclosed somewhere, by someone, or even themselves.

Modern Prior Art Is Everywhere

Here’s the truth that experienced patent lawyers and investors already know: good innovators don’t just invent; they verify.

The strength of your patent is directly proportional to the depth of your prior-art search. If you skip that step, filing a patent becomes a shot in the dark and novelty is lost the moment examiners find a single line in a forgotten repository.

The Three Prior Art Traps Innovators Shouldn’t Underestimate

The Digital Footprint Trap

From your hackathon repo, to that half baked snippet on Stack Overflow, to even your designer’s Figma prototype uploaded on a community forum, anything that touches the open internet, even briefly, can be indexed, archived, and ultimately cited by patent examiners. Hence, if it’s online, assume a patent officer can find it faster than you can delete it.

The Academic & Preprint Trap

Today preprint platforms like arXiv, SSRN, medRxiv, PubMed Preprints, and university repositories are crawled by WIPO, EPO, and USPTO tools. And as a researcher, if you have already explained the architecture, the workflow, the algorithm, or even the motivation behind your idea, your novelty may already be dead. As academia moves faster than the patent system. And it counts.

The Self-Disclosure Trap (The Founder’s Own Mistake)

As we said before in our previous articles, if you go through pitch decks shown at demo days, accelerator websites, Proof-of-Concept videos, LinkedIn “launch soon” posts, conference posters or even early customer showcases, without securing yourselves a patent application date, then you have already step foot in the self-disclosure trap. In strict jurisdictions like Europe, your own disclosure is just as fatal as your competitor’s. In short, marketing too early is the #1 way to lose a patent you deserve.

What Good Prior-Art Due Diligence Actually Looks Like

A real novelty check in 2026 goes far beyond Google Patents. A founder-friendly, investor-safe prior-art search includes:

      a) full sweep of global patent databases (WIPO, USPTO, EPO, KIPRIS)

      b) non-patent literature search (IEEE, ACM, PubMed, arXiv)

      c) GitHub and code repository scans

      d) Detailed analysis of competitor products + documentation

      e) keyword + inventor-name analysis

      f) and always: filing a provisional before you talk to the world

Common Founder Mistakes That Kill Patents (Fast)

      a) assuming “nobody published this” without checking

      b) presenting at Demo Day before filing

      c) ignoring non-patent literature

      d) building on open-source without reading the license

      e) thinking cosmetic changes = novelty

      f) confusing “nobody knows this” with “nobody has disclosed this”

Patent examiners don’t care if something was obscure and only whether it existed.

Why This Matters Even More in 2026

Three trends collided to make novelty incredibly fragile:

      1. Preprint culture exploded – researchers upload before peer review.

      2. AI search tools can detect obscure prior art across languages.

      3. Global patent filings are at an all-time high (WIPO 2024 Report).

      4. Startups are shipping MVPs earlier for traction, creating accidental disclosure.

      5. Tech media leaks everything, often before companies can even file.

      6. Patent offices have tightened novelty thresholds, especially for AI-related inventions.

The window between “idea born” → “world knows” → “novelty destroyed” is now measured in days, not months.

So How to Stay Safe? Here’s what you can do:

      Step 1: Run a novelty search before drafting claims.

      Step 2: File a provisional early – perfection can come later.

      Step 3: Avoid any public disclosure until you have a filing date.

      Step 4: Document the inventive process (helps prove inventorship).

      Step 5: Use AI tools + human experts for prior-art analysis.

      Step 6: Keep updating your patent family as your product evolves.

This isn’t just legal hygiene, it’s strategic defence.

Takeway:

In a world of instant publishing and global visibility, your biggest threat isn’t a competitor; it’s unknown prior art already floating somewhere online.

So, before you file, pitch, or post… ask the most important question in modern innovation: “Is my idea already out there?”

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this newsletter.

Connect with me if you are thinking about IP Protection!

HOW TO PERFECT YOUR PATENT DRAWINGS IN 3 STEPS

What is easier to understand? An instruction manual with illustrations or one that’s just a written description? 

Of course, it’s the one with the illustrations, because it helps us to understand the manual better. You can use these illustrations to visualize the object and to know which part you need to adjust, change, or open to make it work properly. 

And this is exactly how patent drawings work. They:

  • Explain features that the written description alone cannot describe.
  • Help the examiner understand how the invention functions.
  • Support and strengthen the written description, and 
  • Demonstrate completeness and enablement. 

In short, they shape how your invention is understood, examined, and ultimately protected.

Each type of patent requires a certain kind of drawing that best defines it. For instance:

  • Utility Patents generally include innovations in technology, process, or composition of matter. To understand such inventions, we require drawings that explain how the invention works and how each part of it acts. In such cases, line drawings depicting object shapes, block diagrams, flowcharts, and schematics are crucial to understanding the application itself.
  • Design Patents generally focus on the appearance of an innovation or a new item. So unlike utility patents, their drawings don’t require an explanation or proper pointers on how the innovation or a particular part of the innovation works. Drawings for such patents generally include black and white line art (like a sketch) or even photographs. However, design drawings require a lot more attention to detail, and it’s imperative that each minor detail of the design be faithfully represented.

Vital as they are to any patent application, patent drawings still need to be properly structured, defined, and in alignment with the rules of the patent law to be of use to the people accessing the information, be they the examiner or the general public. 

The best patent drawings are not artistic; they are precise. And here is how you can achieve it step by step:

1. PROPER UNDERSTANDING: 

a. UNDERSTANDING THE LEGAL STANDARDS IN DRAWINGS 

Each patent office enforces strict standards for presentation. Before you start drawing, you must understand the requirements for patent drawings in the jurisdiction you intend to file your patent application. This includes

  • Knowing the proper paper size, margins, scale, and proportion.
  • Knowing the types and number of drawings allowed in the patent application
  • Knowing the numbering, line, page number formatting, font, and font sizes allowed.

b. UNDERSTANDING THE RELATION BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND THE INVENTION 

Once you have understood the correct format, you need to ensure that your drawings are aligned with your invention. For this, you will need to do the following: 

  • Identify the proper sequence/chronology for defining your invention. Knowing this will help you arrange the drawings in a proper sequence. It’s like showing step-by-step instructions with illustrations of how the invention works.
  • Labelling them with the correct reference numbers. No one knows your invention better than you. But it’s important that others, most importantly the examiner, understand it the way you do. So you will need to label each part of the drawing with the correct reference number from the written description.

2. PROPER DISPLAY:

a. SHOWING EVERY FACET OF THE INVENTION  

To clearly disclose an invention, various types of drawings are necessary. These drawings collectively show all features of an invention or design and how they relate to each other. They typically include

  • Front, back, left-side, right-side, top, and bottom views for a 3-D structure or front and back views for a 2-D structure, in case of design patents.
  • Sectional and exploded views for showing the working mechanism of the invention, for utility patents.
  • And if your invention involves software, an electrical circuit, a process, or a method, then flowcharts or schematics are necessary for a clear understanding.

b. SHOWING VISIBLE STRUCTURE AND MARKINGS

There are certain elements required in your patent drawings, which may not be part of the invention itself, but are essential in defining the drawings.

  • Proper Labelling and numbering: This involves labelling the drawings with correct reference numbers and numbering them in correct sequence (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, and so on), such that it aligns with the written description.
  • Proper Lining and Shading: In patent drawings, you may want to highlight or hide certain parts of it. For that, you can make drawings with:
  • Solid/bold visible lines – to show claimed portions
  • Dashed lines- to show unclaimed portions
  • Centre/Section lines– to show internal or symmetrical details
  • Lead lines – lines that connect reference numbers to the parts of the drawings
  • Shading – Allow anyone to understand a 3-D figure of an invention, including the depth and structure.

3. PROPER VERIFICATION

a. AVOID THE COMMON ERRORS:

Before you file, ensure that: 

  • All parts of the drawings are clear and visible. Although it is essential to follow the patent rules for proper margins, markings, and even font size, it should not come at the cost of clarity and visibility of the drawings.
  • All drawings are properly arranged and marked. It is essential to ensure that all parts of the drawings are marked with correct reference numbers and are arranged in the same way as the invention has been defined in the written description.
  • All drawings are properly balanced. Inventions usually demand several drawings to present the complete concept effectively. But such drawings should not be crowded together, lest they become over-complicated. 
  • All drawings are uniform. Maintain uniformity and consistency in drawing style, line thickness, and shading. This is a formatting requirement stipulated by most jurisdictions, and varied thickness may require you to provide replacement drawings at a later stage. 
b. ANSWER THE OBJECTIONS IN TIME

Nothing is foolproof in this world, including your drawings. So, in case you get objections after the examination, ensure that you submit and respond promptly to office feedback.

TAKEAWAY

A well-executed illustration accompanying your patent application doesn’t just clarify the patent description, but also

  • Clarifies claim scope in disputes,
  • Supports infringement or licensing negotiations,
  • Enhances investor understanding, and
  • Maintains consistency across jurisdictions.

In other words, clear and precise illustrations can strengthen your patent throughout its life cycle. Remember, Patent drawings are not just supplementary. They are foundational to your Patent Strategy.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this newsletter.

Connect with me if you are thinking about IP Protection!

3 Things To Keep in Mind While Using AI in Your Patent Process

Introduction

Today, in the field of patents, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is emerging as a powerful ally. By supporting inventors, IP professionals, and patent attorneys in conducting searches, managing prosecution, and streamlining the drafting process; AI is giving them time to focus on more strategic aspects of innovation. In fact, the 2024 survey conducted by FICPI’s Practice Management Committee (PMC) found that among those using AI tools for work, 38% use it for patent searches, 19% (approximately) for patent drafting, and 24% use AI for analyzing prior art.

However, AI is still developing and far from being the flawless Jarvis we imagine it to be. Its outputs, while efficient, must be approached with caution, especially concerning accuracy, confidentiality, and compliance with laws.

So, if you are considering integrating AI into your patent process, here are three important things to keep in mind. 

1. How Can AI Be Useful?

AI has changed how things are prepared, reviewed, and filed. Today, you can use AI for more than one stage of your patent application, such as:  

  • Conducting Patent searches – AI can narrow down the scope of your prior art search criteria and even categorize existing patents based on grounds set by you.
  • Drafting Patent Applications – AI may help you provide quick drafts within minutes, reduce efforts and hours, save money, reduce clerical errors, and even suggest broader claims (providing, of course, that the AI database supports higher level tasks). 
  • Generating Patent Drawings – AI can help to generate drawings of your invention, either based on images or even text, and even aid in labeling them
  • Plus, AI can even help you analyze or review patent applications.

However, these benefits are only realized if you use it in the right way, such as:

  • Providing a complete invention disclosure – Think of AI as a person with no prior knowledge about your invention. To allow an AI to process your novel invention,, you will need to define all parts of it (background technology, unique features, competitive advantages etc.) in detail.
  • Reviewing the AI output – Even if we input all the relevant information, the AI may not necessarily give us the desired or required output. You will need to strictly review the output before finalizing your patent draft.  

 

2. How Using AI Is Risky

While AI may be beneficial, it is not foolproof and comes with certain risks: 

  • Confidentiality risks: Using AI tools without strong data protection, especially cloud-based AI tools, comes with the inherent risks related to privacy and confidentiality.  The information or prompts that you are providing the AI get stored on a third-party server, which, if released by mistake or used in training an AI model, can make you lose the novelty aspect of your patent. 
  • AI hallucinations: Sometimes AI tools can generate data, citations, or facts that may seem to be true, but are actually false. Such mistakes are called AI hallucinations. These mistakes, if not addressed, can be fatal during patent prosecution . 
  • Quality detection issues: Today, AI tools are being used so widely that people can decide whether a text is AI-generated or not from a small sample. So even if the content is accurate, certain phrases or patterns may reveal its AI origin, which could affect perceptions of the quality or originality of your draft.

 

3. How to Choose the Right AI

Not every “AI-powered” tool understands patents. Many simply generate text, not structured applications. Thus, it’s necessary to look out for certain essential elements when selecting an AI tool for your patent process.

While most AI tools, especially for patents, are Generative AI-based on Large Language Models (LLM), a good patent AI tool is the one that:

  • Maintains confidentiality – Since you are providing the information about your patent, the  AI tool you pick must have strong encryption with no data retention policy. Local AI tools as opposed to cloud-based AI tools are much better suited to this. Thus, it is necessary to know about the privacy policy, terms of use, and data handling practices of such AI tools.
  • Consider the Prior Art and have access to a database – If an AI tool has access to various patent databases not only of your jurisdiction but also of other jurisdictions as well, then this will not only help you in your prior art search but also save your time in drafting patent applications. A larger database  can better process the existing prior art from  different jurisdictions. 
  • Understand the legal compliances: Any AI tool can translate or format your invention into claims by simple commands. But a good AI tool should have the capability of understanding your invention in context  with the existing law and provide drafts accordingly, such as the correct format, correct size, correct number of claims, and so on.
  • Can customize and is flexible – Each patent draft is unique, and may be different based on your invention or jurisdiction (where you intend to file). Thus, an AI tool that can adapt your drafts into different templates in its output is more desirable.
  • Explains the Drafts created – Don’t choose an AI that just drafts instantly without showing how claims were structured or which prior art was considered. An AI tool that offers transparency by explaining how it builds claims or maps concepts not only helps you to review it more effectively, but also lets you understand your own invention more correctly.
  • Provides Drawings: If an AI tool, apart from just drafting a patent, can also provide aid in drafting drawings, then it is a cherry on the cake and would save a lot of time and effort in the preparation of your patent application.
  • Aligns with your budget – AI is the future, but it’s not compulsory. Given the stringent requirements for AI-based patent drafting, careful curation of the tools you use are required. Under such circumstances, make sure that the AI tool you use aligns with your budget. 

The Key Takeaway

What must be remembered is that AI is here to assist you,  not to do the entire task. Even if you select the best AI for your patent search and drafting, it does not mean that it won’t make mistakes.

When using AI, think of the inventor as a teacher, who needs to guide the AI so that it can understand and explain the inventions as we know and want to. While certain AI tools have better capabilities and understanding than others and can provide the desired results with less effort, it’s ultimately up to the inventor to decide if it’s worth spending time and resources guiding the AI and entrusting his confidential knowledge to it.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this newsletter.

Connect with me if you are thinking about IP Protection!

How One Strategic Shift Saved This Startup’s IP Budget (And Made Their Portfolio 10x Stronger)

When a fast-growing consumer tech startup came to us with a full IP portfolio already in place (multiple trademarks, two pending patents, one design registration across six countries), we expected them to be protected. What we didn’t expect was this question from the founder: “Are we doing this right? Because honestly, none of this seems to be helping us.”

That moment captured the essence of a problem many companies face but few admit: they’re investing in IP, but not seeing any return. Their IP feels disconnected; like a legal layer sitting on top of their business, instead of one working for it.

What followed was a strategic overhaul. We helped the company rebuild their IP roadmap. Not by filing more, but by aligning every protection decision with a clear business goal. That one shift changed everything.

Let’s walk through how.

The Misstep: Protecting Everything Without Purpose

This startup did what many high-growth companies do. As soon as their MVP gained traction, they started filing. A provisional patent here,a trademark there and another patent-in Europe. The goal? “Protect everything before someone copies us.”

The intention was good; but the execution was reactionary. Their filings were based on instinct, investor pressure, and fear of being left unprotected.

Six months in, they had:

  • A pending patent in two markets where they had no customers
  • A trademark registration for a product name that was already being rebranded
  • A design registration for a prototype that had been scrapped

In short, they were spending thousands on maintenance and renewals, without clarity on what value those filings were actually creating.

Step One: Tie Every Filing to a Business Goal

The first thing we asked the team to do was pause, and pull up their product roadmap, marketing strategy, and fundraising plans. We wanted to know: Where they would be expanding? What will they be launching next quarter? and What is their investor story?

From that, it became clear:

  • The company’s expansion focus was Southeast Asia and the UAE, yet none of their IP filings covered those regions
  • Their upcoming pitch deck emphasized exclusive AI-based algorithms, but those weren’t even mentioned in the original patent claims
  • Their rebranding was weeks away and yet their legal budget was tied up in trademarks for the outgoing brand

With that clarity, we aligned the IP filings with what the business was actually doing. The result? Immediate budget reallocation to patents that covered the tech investors cared about, and trademark filings in regions that matched market entry timelines.

Step Two: Prioritize Depth Over Breadth

Previously, their strategy was to file broadly across regions and categories. But when we looked closer, most of the filings were thin. One-word claims. Overlapping coverage. Trademark classes they didn’t operate in.

So we flipped the approach.

Instead of filing across ten countries, we focused on three priority markets: their home base, their first export market, and the key competitor’s territory. We narrowed trademarks to specific classes that directly impacted revenue. We rewrote patent claims to focus on what made the tech uniquely valuable and not just what was new. 

The result was less paperwork, but more protection. Because now, every filing had weight. It was defensible, enforceable, and strategically chosen.

Step Three: Build Protection Around Value, Not Features

In their original patent, much of the claim language focused on surface-level functionality: interface elements, feature descriptions, integration flow. But the real value? It was buried in the algorithm—the smart layer powering their system. Yet that part had only one vague mention in the draft. So we rewrote the patent with one goal: protect what investors would pay for.

We worked closely with their product and tech teams to describe the core innovation: the learning model that adapted in real-time. We translated it into claim language that could stand up to challenge and support licensing down the line.

The shift was subtle, but powerful. Now, their IP didn’t just protect a tool. It protected competitive advantage.

Step Four: Replace the Filing Calendar with a Strategic Review Cycle

One of the most impactful changes we made wasn’t legal; it was operational. Before, the team had a fixed filing calendar: file new IP every quarter, file overseas versions six months later and check for renewals every year.

That calendar was replaced with a simple rule: every quarter, ask two questions:

  1. What has changed in our business?
  2. How should our IP reflect that?

That rule led to smart decisions. Like dropping a trademark in a region they exited. Or choosing not to patent a feature that was pivoting. Or accelerating a design registration ahead of a product launch that suddenly gained press traction.

IP became flexible. Responsive. Aligned.

The Outcome: Less IP, More Value

Six months after the overhaul, the startup had fewer registrations, but stronger coverage. Their filings matched their growth plans. Their investor decks aligned with protected assets. Their budget dropped by 30%, while their valuation story grew stronger.

And most importantly, they felt in control. IP was no longer a legal afterthought. It was a strategic asset.

So, What Can You Learn From This?

Whether you’re a startup, a scaling business, or an established enterprise, the takeaway is the same: your IP should follow your strategy and not the other way around.

Before your next filing, ask:

  • What part of your business does this support?
  • Is this asset still relevant to what you’re building?
  • Will this IP help you grow, protect, or monetize something that matters?

If the answer is yes, proceed with confidence. If not, rethink the approach.

An aligned IP strategy isn’t just smarter,it’s more sustainable, defensible, and valuable in the long run. And that’s exactly what IP is meant to be.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this newsletter.

Connect with me if you are thinking about IP Protection!

Is Your Provisional Patent Really Helpful? Only If You Use It Right

Six months ago, a founder came to us in a panic.

Her startup had just launched a new health-tech prototype. She had pitched it at a demo day, received overwhelming interest from two major investors, and suddenly found herself racing against time.

“We filed a provisional patent right before the pitch,” she said. “But now we’re not sure what to do next. Can we change it? Is it even valid? Are we protected?”

This is where many startups and innovators find themselves-believing a provisional patent is a silver bullet, which is quick, cheap, and protective. In truth, a provisional patent is only as useful as the strategy behind it. Used right, it’s a brilliant head start. Used wrong, it’s a false safety net.

Here’s what I’ve learned from guiding dozens of founders through this process:

Why Provisional Patents Became So Popular

Provisional patent applications were introduced to give inventors flexibility. Instead of spending time and resources drafting a full specification, you could file a simpler document, establish a priority date, and then come back with a complete application within 12 months.

In theory, that sounds ideal; especially for early-stage ideas. It gives you room to test, pivot, and raise funds, all while keeping your innovation protected from being scooped.

But in practice? The way provisional patents are used often falls short of what they promise.

The Most Common Misuse: Filing and Forgetting

The founder who came to us had done what many others do: she filed a barebones provisional application using an online form builder, added a few sketches and descriptions, and assumed that meant her invention was now protected.

It wasn’t.

What she didn’t realize was that a provisional patent doesn’t grant you any enforceable rights. It doesn’t get examined. It doesn’t get published. And it won’t protect anything that wasn’t clearly described inside it. If your description is vague, your coverage is vague. If you pivot your product after filing, and don’t update the filing, your new invention might not be covered at all.

In other words, a poorly drafted provisional can give the illusion of protection, while leaving critical innovations exposed.

Where a Provisional Patent Shines

Now, that doesn’t mean provisionals are useless. In fact, they can be incredibly powerful when used with intention.

They are most helpful in fast-moving scenarios where disclosure is inevitable. Think startup pitches, product demos, launch campaigns, or investor due diligence. In those moments, you need to lock in your priority date before you reveal anything publicly.

Provisionals allow you to say: this is the point in time when I claimed ownership of this invention. That claim is your priority date, which protects you against someone else filing the same invention later. It gives you time to develop, validate, and refine your invention, while holding your place in line. But again, that only works if what you filed was detailed, specific, and accurate.

How to Use a Provisional Patent the Right Way

The key to making a provisional patent actually useful is to treat it like a full filing, having a little flexibility. That means:

  • Describe your invention in as much detail as you can. Don’t assume you’ll “add it later.”
  • Include any variations or alternative configurations that you might explore during the year.
  • Document how it works, why it works, and what makes it novel. Think like a technical storyteller.

In short, don’t treat the provisional as a placeholder, treat it as a first draft of your real protection.

Then, use the 12-month window wisely. Reassess your product direction. Gather user feedback. Build a business case. And when you’re ready, file your complete (non-provisional) patent with stronger claims, refined technical details, and a clearer commercial strategy.

What Happens If You Wait Too Long

The founder who came to us realized this just in time. She was in month ten of her provisional window, and hadn’t started preparing her full application. Worse, her product had changed significantly since the first filing.

Had she waited longer, she might’ve lost the chance to protect her updated invention entirely. The deadline would have passed, and any new version of the product would need to be filed as a new application, with a new priority date.

That’s a huge risk in competitive markets. Filing a complete patent too late could mean someone else beats you to the office with a similar idea and you lose out, even if you were first to build. That’s why we always advise founders: mark the 12-month expiry the day you file your provisional. Treat it like a countdown. And plan your complete filing proactively, not reactively.

What You Really Gain from Filing Provisional First

If done right, a provisional patent gives you:

  • Speed: because you can file faster than a full patent.
  • Security: because you lock in your ownership before revealing anything.
  • Strategy: because you gain a year to refine your tech and align your patent to your business model.

It’s especially useful for:

  • Product teams launching in public
  • Startups pitching to investors
  • Companies with early-stage prototypes
  • Innovators still finalizing features or UI

But the filing is only the beginning. The real value is in how you use that year.

So, Is It Really Helpful?

Yes, if you file it intentionally, and follow it up strategically.

No, if you treat it like a shortcut, and delay important decisions.

In the end, a provisional patent is not a substitute for a full application. It’s a tool for protecting your innovation before you’re ready to commit to the full process. Like any tool, it works best when it’s used with clarity and care.

So before you file one, ask yourself:

  • Am I doing this just to “check the box” before launch?
  • Or am I using this window to prepare for a stronger, smarter patent filing?

If it’s the latter, you’re on the right path.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this newsletter.

Connect with me if you are thinking about IP Protection!

Think Before You File : 5 Smart Moves to Make Your Patent Application a Success

You’ve built something innovative—maybe even revolutionary. It’s functional. It solves a real problem. Your instinct tells you: protect it.

And that’s correct. But when it comes to patents, timing and strategy are everything.

In practice, many patent filings are rushed. The result? Weak protection, unnecessary delays, and in some cases, outright rejection. Filing a patent is not just a formality; it’s a business-critical step that deserves planning, precision, and foresight.

Here are five smart, globally-relevant steps you should take before you file a patent application. These aren’t just legal checkpoints—they’re strategic moves that can determine whether your patent becomes a protective shield or just paperwork.

1. Protect Before You Pitch

One of the most common; but costly mistakes innovators make is discussing their invention publicly before securing protection. A product demo, a slide deck, or even an informal conversation over coffee may count as “public disclosure” in many jurisdictions. And once the idea is in the public domain, you may lose your ability to patent it altogether.

To avoid this, confidentiality must be your first move. Sign Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) before sharing your invention with potential collaborators, manufacturers, or investors.

If early disclosure is unavoidable—say, at a startup pitch or trade show; consider filing a provisional application first. This establishes a priority date and buys you 12 months to finalize your complete application. A brief consultation with an IP expert can also help you avoid disclosure pitfalls that are easy to overlook but hard to reverse.

2. Build a Clear, Detailed Patent Blueprint

Your invention might be clear in your head; but is it equally clear on paper? A successful patent application rests on thorough, precise documentation. Think of it as creating a blueprint, not for yourself, but for someone skilled in your field who’s seeing the invention for the first time.

Start by writing down how the invention works—step by step. Use visuals, diagrams, and flowcharts where applicable. Avoid overly technical language unless necessary, and focus on making the invention understandable to both technical and legal reviewers. If your documentation can’t convincingly describe what the invention is, how it works, and how it’s different from existing solutions, the application is likely to face challenges.

Well-prepared documentation streamlines the drafting process, improves the quality of claims, and enhances your chances of a smooth examination. It also becomes a valuable resource should you need to license, defend, or further develop the invention down the line.

3. Ask Yourself the 3 Big Questions

Patents are not granted for just any idea. Globally, patent offices follow a set of core requirements that can be boiled down into three fundamental questions:

Is it new? Your invention must not have been disclosed anywhere in the world—whether in a research paper, another patent, or even a product brochure. Novelty is an absolute requirement.

Is it useful? The invention must have some practical application. It must do something, solve a problem, or offer a benefit that’s tangible and real.

Is it non-obvious? This is where many applications fall short. If the invention is something that would be obvious to someone skilled in the field, based on existing knowledge, it may not be considered inventive.

These questions aren’t just legal checks- they’re strategic filters. If the answer to any one of them is unclear, it may be worth refining the invention or revisiting the protection strategy.

4. Search Before You File

A prior art search is a critical, yet often underestimated, step in the patent journey. It’s not just about checking whether someone has already invented the same thing—it’s about understanding the landscape you’re stepping into.

Prior art includes anything that’s already been disclosed to the public, whether through patents, academic publications, product manuals, or technical websites. By exploring this material, you can identify what has already been done and more importantly, where your invention stands out.

Several free tools are available to assist with this: WIPO’s Patentscope, the European Patent Office’s Espacenet, and Google Patents are excellent starting points. While a professional search adds more depth, even a basic review can help shape your application to emphasize what’s truly novel.

Prior art searching isn’t just about avoiding rejection—it’s about positioning your invention strategically and drafting claims that are focused, defendable, and valuable.

5. Think Globally, Start Strategically

Patents are territorial rights, meaning protection must be sought in each country or region where you want coverage. For most applicants, the journey begins with a national filing—usually in their home country.

From there, you have two primary options for expanding globally. The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) allows you to file one international application and then decide, within a set timeline, which countries you want to pursue. Alternatively, the Paris Convention route lets you file in other countries within 12 months of your first filing, preserving your original priority date.

In deciding how and where to file, consider your business goals. Are you planning to enter global markets? Will your product be manufactured abroad? Are you seeking investment that might depend on international IP? Your answers will help determine whether to file provisionally, go straight to a complete application, or build an international filing strategy from day one.

Timing also matters. Delaying a global filing decision beyond the 12-month window could limit your options or lead to gaps in protection. A conversation with an IP counsel at this stage can make your filing process both efficient and aligned with your broader business vision.

Key Takeaways

Filing a patent is not simply a matter of submitting forms—it’s a strategic step in protecting the value you’ve created. The decisions you make before filing will influence the strength, scope, and longevity of your protection. Begin by:

  1. Safeguarding your invention through confidentiality.
  2. Invest the time to document it clearly.
  3. Evaluate its novelty, usefulness, and inventiveness.
  4. Understand the existing landscape through prior art.
  5. And choose your filing path with your global business goals in mind.

Each step is simple in concept, but powerful in impact. And together, they form the foundation for a patent that actively supports your innovation journey.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this newsletter.

Connect with me if you are thinking about IP Protection! 

4 Things to Keep in Mind While Drafting a Patent

Take this scenario. You’ve been working on an invention and it is finally at the stage where it can be patented. You also know that a patent is very important when it comes to protecting your innovation, and that getting a patent as quickly as possible helps to head off competitors.

At this stage, your primary requirement is a well-drafted patent application. This application is what your patent hinges on. It decides if your invention fulfils all the requirements set out by the patent office, and the ambit of protection your invention gets. 

Why is a Well-Drafted Patent Application Necessary?

The rate of grants for patent applications is roughly 50%. Which is to say that one in two applications submitted to the patent office will be refused. And of course, the value of your work- all the products using the technology, or the licensing of the technology, hinge upon getting the patent protection. How well your invention is protected is directly proportional to how well your application is drafted. 

So what can you do to make sure that your patent application fulfils the requirements set out by the patent office? What must you pay attention to when reviewing it? 

Here are 5 things you must pay attention to when drafting or reviewing a patent application.

#1: The NUNS Criteria 

The first thing every potential patent applicant should keep in mind is what’s known as the NUNS criteria. NUNS stands for “Novelty, Utility, Non-Obviousness, and Subject Matter Eligibility.” 

After you submit a patent application, it gets examined by the patent office. Almost all patent applications receive objections, and all of the substantial objections are made on the basis of one of these categories. If your patent gets rejected, chances are it’s because your application did not fulfil one or more of the NUNS requirements. 

A key component of understanding the novelty and non-obviousness of your invention is the patentability search of the relevant prior art. A patentability search helps the inventor understand the current technology, and get a better understanding of the position of your invention in the potential market.

#2: The Scope of the Claims

The claims are the most important part of any patent application. The claims are a relatively short section at the end of your patent description which decide what exactly it is that you get protection on. Regardless of how detailed or sparse your patent description is, what ultimately decides on the scope of protection are your claims. 

Claims must be carefully drafted, and a fine toothed comb must be run over every single word in this section. Even misplaced articles or commas can result in the protection you get being completely different from the one you want. 

Additionally, they must neither be too broad, nor too narrow. An overly broad claim is very likely to be rejected, while a narrow claim may only protect your invention partially. A matter of a few words or a few lines can mean the difference between your application getting rejected or accepted. 

Deciding the scope of the claims must be done while keeping in mind the NUNS criteria, as well as the potential competitors in the market. Patent drafting is a multi-faceted process where the drafter is constantly looking into a number of variables, all of which must be balanced if your final draft is to be successful.  

#3: The Written Description

If your claims are what you can actually protect, your written description is the record of why and how your invention represents those claims. A claim that is not fully supported by the written description is liable to be rejected on the grounds of there being not enough information to show the application of the claims. 

The enablement requirement for patent applications is this- the examiner, representing a person of ordinary skill in the art, must be able to reliably understand and use the invention described without having to do their own undue experimentation. This element ties in with the requirement of sufficient descriptions for patent claims as well, and both must be carefully considered for a well-drafted written description.

#4: The Patent Application Format

Each patent office in the world has specific requirements for how the text and the drawings are formatted and arranged, and not following the national or regional norms will result in an objection at the examination stage. While this is relatively minor and easily corrected, especially in comparison to the other elements I’ve listed, it can still cause undue delays.

Paying close attention to and cross-checking the formatting requirements can save you a lot of trouble in the examination stage, especially if you are scrambling to come up with detailed replies to the substantive rejections.

Takeaways

Patents can be very valuable, but they are not always easy to obtain. The most important tool any innovator has to get their patent granted is the patent application. 

The application drafting process may seem pretty simple at first glance (describe your invention, and claim what you want to protect) but it can be very complex in practice. This is because of the many considerations and elements you have to simultaneously take care of to come up with an effective draft. 

What I’ve listed here are four key elements of an effective draft, and I hope that gives you a better idea of what you should be aiming at for the final application.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this blog.

To never miss an update, subscribe to my newsletter here.

Top 3 Mistakes Innovators Make That Cause the Loss of Patent Rights

Imagine this scenario- you’ve been working on an invention for a while. It’s taken you a lot of effort, and the results are promising. Your efforts have resulted in something that makes life easier for people, that makes things run better and faster. 

Then you come across a stumbling block- despite all the effort you’ve put in, and despite all the usefulness of the invention, you’re unable to get a patent on it. 

What Went Wrong?

This happens more than you’d think. Innovation is the watchword of today, and plenty of people are making new and improved technology all the time. But relatively little of that technology actually makes it to the commercialization stage. Sometimes, even when the technology can be marketed, lack of adequate protection can prevent you from getting tangible monetary benefits out of your work. 

Why does this happen? How can you prevent yourself from getting into such a situation? 

After working with more than 800 innovators, business strategists, and entrepreneurs, I’ve come across three common mistakes that can cost you your patent rights.  

Mistake #1: Premature Publication

Technology is usually protected with patents, and the key aspect of any patent is in its novelty. Unfortunately, a lot of innovators and inventors do not quite understand how stringent the novelty requirements for a patent are. 

I have come across several instances of an excited academic or researcher publishing the key ideas involved in their eventual patent application, only to have it come back and work against them during the patent prosecution stage. 

The lack of novelty in an application is hard to counter, even when the inventor themselves is the person publishing the information. Many patent applications have failed on that point alone. 

If you are working on a technology with the ultimate aim of patenting, commercializing and marketing it, you need to remember that secrecy is the name of the game. 

Make sure that the only people who know what’s happening with your research are your fellow inventors and other people indispensable to your process, funding, or business strategy. Even within these exclusive circles, using non-disclosure agreements to add a further layer of protection is probably wise.  

At the end of the day, your aim should be to make sure that the first time the world hears about your invention, it’s through your patent application. 

Mistake #2: Not Doing A Patentability Search

If you are an inventor who has spent all that time, money, and effort into making your invention, chances are you want to get yourself a patent as fast as you can. This makes sense, especially since you need to make sure that nobody else patents something similar before you do it. Speed matters in the patent process.

For a lot of people, this means filing your application as soon as it’s in any kind of coherent shape. However, this means that people sometimes skip a very crucial pre-patenting process: the patentability search. 

A patentability search looks into all available literature surrounding a particular technology, and lets you know if your invention is likely to be granted a patent or not. As an added bonus, if your invention has multiple points of innovation, the patentability search can reveal which aspect to focus on so that you have a higher chance of getting a patent.  

The patent process can be long, complicated, exhausting, and expensive. If you get your twenty years of exclusive rights over technology, all that effort is worth it. If you don’t, you’ve spent a lot of resources on something that is of no practical use to you. 

The patentability search is a crucial tool that helps you avoid such a scenario, and skipping it can be very costly. 

Mistake #3: Not Having A Clear Business Strategy

In the case of any new technology, your ultimate aim is going to be commercialization. Your patent is going to be of no use to you if you cannot monetize it. 

This monetization can take many forms. The most obvious, of course, is manufacturing a product using the technology you’ve just patented. Other forms of monetization include patent licensing or patent assignments, or building up your patent portfolio so as to increase the viability and value of your enterprise.  

While the exact way of monetizing your patent is up to you, a clear business strategy for your IP is essential. As I’ve emphasized before, getting a patent is usually a lot of work. Doing that much work on something that is ultimately of no use to you is simply not practical. 

In fact, in some cases, it might actually be more beneficial to a business to never file for the patent and keep the technology a trade secret for as long as possible. Whichever way you choose, knowing exactly how your IP strategy will affect your business and marketing plans is essential. 

Takeaways

I don’t need to tell you that the technology and innovation arena is highly competitive and very fast paced. If you’re an innovator, you already know this is the case. Patents are a valuable tool you can use to protect your efforts in this field. 

However, innovators often have an improper understanding of how patents and other IPs work. Sometimes, innovators may also fail to consider how their IP protection affects their individual business needs. All of this drastically affects your chances of properly protecting your innovations. 

The three common mistakes I spoke of are only one aspect of protecting your technology, but it’s an important one.   

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this blog. 

To never miss an update, subscribe to my newsletter here.

Why Do The Majority of Successful Innovators Conduct a Patentability Search?

Have you ever filed a patent application that got refused?

This is a very common occurrence. Generally speaking, more than half the patents filed in most jurisdictions get refused. The patent grant rate is approximately 50% in India and  52% in the USA, the numbers are not likely to be in an inventor’s favor at first glance. 

Clearly, this situation is not ideal. If you’re going through all the effort of filing and prosecuting a patent, you’d like an assurance of something tangible coming to you at the end. A granted patent allows you to monopolize a particular technology for about 20 years, which can be a massive boon to anyone working in today’s fast-moving and competitive industry. 

So, what is it that makes a patent application get rejected? With our personal experience in the field, we’ve noticed a few recurring issues.

Why Does This Happen?

The fact is, most patents get rejected because they do not, at the time of filing, fulfil the necessary conditions to get a patent. 

Every patent application must mandatorily fulfil certain basic requirements, with no exceptions. These may vary a little between jurisdictions in terms of specifics, but the general ideas are common throughout the world. 

Patent attorneys and experts make use of ‘NUNS’,  a simple mnemonic to keep track of these criteria. If your initial application has been made keeping all the NUNS requirements in mind, your application’s chances of getting granted increase exponentially. 

In fact, an application with airtight fulfilment of the NUNS criteria might even be that rare phenomenon- a patent application that is granted immediately, without any objections from the patent office.

NUNS stands for four factors, Novelty, Utility, Non-Obviousness, and Subject Matter Eligibility. 

Novelty

Novelty is the first thing you think of when you have a patent. A patent is special because the invention is new, has never been seen before, and will bring about progress (incremental or otherwise) to existing technology. If there is no novel element in your invention, there is no possibility of you getting a patent. Your invention must, at the very least, be capable of something new, or do something already known in an entirely new manner.

Utility

Utility is the simplest of the requirements in many ways. Any patent you apply for must be useful. The requirements for what counts are useful differ between jurisdictions, but it’s very rarely that they will be unmet. After all, if you are going through all the trouble of patenting your technology, it is almost certainly likely to be useful in some way or another. 

Non-Obviousness

Non-obviousness, also known as the “Inventive Step” in many countries, is usually connected to novelty. It focuses on what inventive idea the innovator had when making the subject of the patent. The basic requirement is that this idea must not be obvious to a person who is skilled in the field of that technology. 

If your inventive step is only something that surprises those who are unfamiliar with the technology, chances are your patent will face an objection and may even be rejected. This requirement is also why patent examiners are people who are skilled in the field of that technology- without such knowledge, judging this step would be impossible. 

Subject Matter Eligibility

The final requirement, subject matter eligibility, also has jurisdictional variations. In principle, it is simple- there are a number of already decided subject matters that are not granted patents by default. 

For example, pretty much all jurisdictions do not allow for the patentability of newly discovered scientific knowledge. Some, but not all jurisdictions, do not allow medical methods to be patented. The types of organisms you can patent (typically related to gene-engineering) also vary between countries and regions. 

The patentability of things like software and business methods have been debated hotly for many years at this point, and how that patentability is judged varies between jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions may have comparatively rarer restrictions, such as a ban on patenting anything that goes against “public morality”. 

Key Takeaways

Now that we know what these four requirements are, how do we actually make sure we fulfil them?

Being careful during the filing process is certainly one way of doing this, but there’s another factor that a lot of inventors miss, and that is the patentability search. 

The search concentrates on the two most difficult aspects of patentability; novelty and non-obviousness. A thorough search can give you insights on what technologies are similar to yours, and how you can construct your draft so as to focus on the actual, novel and non-obvious element you have at your disposal. 

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this blog.

To never miss an update, subscribe to my newsletter here!

How to Get A Patent Granted in 5 Simple Steps

How to get a patent granted

Ever tried to get a patent granted? If you have, you probably know how complex and long winded the process is. 

Not only do you have to delve more and more deeply into the nitty-gritties of how your invention is novel, you also need to pay attention to existing claims and the specifics of what you want to draft and what you have to disclose. 

This is not even getting into the many, many procedural requirements. Every country or organization that grants a patent has their own requirements. All of them need a very specific, individualized set of forms and formal procedures you need to complete. 

Under such circumstances, it can be difficult for any inventor, whose acumen and skills lies in the technology sector, to wrangle with legal tangles. But we’re here to help you cut through the clutter a little. 

After working with over 200 inventors, we have discovered the best way to start your patent journey. We’ve also boiled it down to five simple steps for your reference.

Step 1: Know What You Need To Do

The first mistake every innovator makes is in underestimating the time and effort that goes into getting a patent granted. The invention is merely the first step, protecting it is a whole other matter altogether.

Much like inventions themselves, patents benefit a lot from solid initial investments. A thorough and complete patentability search and expertly drafted patent specifications and claims can go a long way. 

These are the building blocks of your patent, which largely decide how strong your claim to your invention is, and they must not be neglected simply because you cannot see immediate returns on your investment.

Step 2: Do A Patentability Search

Innovations and inventions are not uncommon in today’s world, especially in the technology sector. As per the World Intellectual Property Organization, more than 3.5 million patents were filed in 2021 alone, and the number is only expected to grow.

With so many filings, it’s only natural that a lot of inventions may have overlapping elements. In fact, it is entirely possible that key elements of your invention have already been filed for protection in some form by someone else in another region. 

In such cases, establishing the all-important novelty for your invention might be hard, and all the time, money, and effort that went into your patent application may be wasted. 

A patentability search allows you to avoid this risk. Doing one gives you an overview of potentially conflicting inventions and the elements that may cause that conflict. This in turns allows you to draft the application with a focus on the elements that are actually novel, increasing your chances of getting the patent granted.  

Step 3. Identify the Key Elements in Your Invention

Novelty is one of the biggest stumbling blocks in any application. 

Your innovation is likely to have a key point that makes it uniquely novel. However, it may not be immediately obvious what that key point is, even to the actual inventor. Usually, a discussion between the inventor and a patent agent who has done a patentability search is required to tease out the actual point of novelty in any application.

Once this novelty is identified, the key innovative step must also be taken into account. The patent draft can then be written keeping these two points in mind.

Step 4. Prepare an Effective Patent Draft

The patent draft is the culmination of all your prep work. It’s where you take all the knowledge that you have gained over the past few steps so that you can make an application that stands the least chance of being rejected.

While there are provisions for making small changes to your patent draft in pretty much all jurisdictions, these changes are there only for minor issues. For example, if the examiner deems that an element you’ve already explained is insufficiently clear, the applicant can add additional information to clarify that element. 

However, you cannot bring in new material to a patent draft. Neither can you highlight a new element of novelty that was missed out on in the initial draft. 

The competence of your draft directly influences how likely it is that your invention will pass the examination stage with few or (in some very rare cases) even no objections. 

Step 5. Keep Both Legal and Technological Elements in Mind When Prosecuting Your Patent

Most patent applications are subject to initial objections from the patent office of whichever jurisdiction you decide to file them in. 

If you have followed all the steps so far, chances are you have a solid patent draft with key elements of novelty and inventive step that make your invention patentable. Now, the issue changes to how you can communicate that to the patent examiner. 

Replies to patent examinations can be written or oral. In many cases, so long as the patent draft has all the key elements that make it patentable, a written response alone may be enough to clear the objections. 

Regardless of if the response is written or not, the person authorized to represent the applicant must have a clear idea of the invention and all the steps that led to the patent application and objection. This is also why it is preferable to have one party handle the entire matter from search to prosecution of the patent, as they will have the greatest understanding of your invention with the least amount of effort on your part.

 

Key Takeaways

 

Patent filing may look like a lot of work, and that’s because it is usually the case. However, one of the most disheartening parts of the process is how it may not even be possible to get your patent granted after all of that work. 

The only way to exclude this possibility is to have a qualified patent attorney work along with you every step of the way. The attorney will know what to do and what to avoid, which parts of the invention to focus on and which ones to downplay.

Getting a patent granted may not be easy, but the steps involved in it are certainly simple. Keep these few things in mind, and you exponentially increase your chances of getting patent protection for your invention.

Interested in innovation, technology and patent protection? I have a lot of insights into how technology protection works from my years in the field, and I’ll be sharing more of them on this blog.

To never miss an update, subscribe to my newsletter here.

 

PRIGGYA ARORA

ABOUT PRIGGYA    |    PODCAST    |     NEWSLETTER    |     PA LEGAL    |    BOOK A STRATEGY CALL